Office of Small Failures / Case File 002
← Back to office
Automation triage machine

Should I Automate This?

Not every repetitive task deserves a workflow, an agent, or twelve API calls. This tool decides whether to AUTOMATE, ASSIST, or keep the job human.

Input

Describe the work

01
Clear inputs + clear rules = easier to automate safely.
This is a triage tool, not an automation architecture. High-risk or irreversible work should keep a human approval step even when parts are automated.

Should this task be automated?

This free automation assessment helps you decide whether repetitive work is a good candidate for automation, should be assisted by AI or software, or should stay human.

What makes a task suitable for automation?

Good automation candidates are usually repetitive, frequent, rule-based, supported by digital inputs and reasonably reversible if something goes wrong. High-risk work, frequent exceptions and tasks where human judgement is the point need more caution.

Automation vs AI assistance

Not every repetitive task needs AI. Some work is better handled with a simple rule, workflow, spreadsheet formula or conventional automation. The tool separates the value of automation from the question of whether human judgement should remain in the loop.

Prioritising SEO work instead? Try the WorthDoing SEO prioritisation tool.